<- RFC Index (8701..8800)
(also BCP 25)
Updates RFC 7776
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) P. Resnick
Request for Comments: 8716 Episteme Technology Consulting LLC
BCP: 25 A. Farrel
Updates: 7776 Old Dog Consulting
Category: Best Current Practice February 2020
ISSN: 2070-1721
Update to the IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures for the Replacement of the
IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC) with the IETF
Administration LLC
Abstract
The IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures are described in RFC 7776.
The IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC) has been replaced
by the IETF Administration LLC, and the IETF Administrative Director
has been replaced by the IETF LLC Executive Director. This document
updates RFC 7776 to amend these terms.
RFC 7776 contained updates to RFC 7437. RFC 8713 has incorporated
those updates, so this document also updates RFC 7776 to remove those
updates.
Status of This Memo
This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
BCPs is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8716.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Changes to RFC 7776
2.1. Changes to Section 3.4
2.2. Changes to Section 5
2.3. Changes to References to RFC 7437
2.3.1. Changes to Metadata
2.3.2. Changes to the Abstract
2.3.3. Changes to Section 5.1
3. IANA Considerations
4. Security Considerations
5. References
5.1. Normative References
5.2. Informative References
Acknowledgements
Authors' Addresses
1. Introduction
The IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures are described in RFC 7776
[RFC7776]. Those procedures include direction for the IETF Chair and
Ombudsteam to take advice from the IETF Administrative Oversight
Committee (IAOC) with respect to the budget available for training.
The IAOC has been replaced by the IETF Administration LLC, and the
IETF Administrative Director has been replaced by the IETF LLC
Executive Director. This document updates RFC 7776 to amend these
terms and to update a reference.
RFC 7776 contained updates to [RFC7437]. [RFC8713] has incorporated
those updates, so this document also updates RFC 7776 to remove those
updates.
This document makes no other changes to the procedures described in
RFC 7776.
2. Changes to RFC 7776
2.1. Changes to Section 3.4
Section 3.4 of [RFC7776] is about the qualifications and training of
the Ombudsteam. The last paragraph of that section is replaced as
follows:
OLD
| In determining the appropriate training, the IETF Chair and
| Ombudsteam shall take professional advice and will consult with
| the IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC) with respect to
| the overall IETF budget.
NEW
| In determining the appropriate training, the IETF Chair and
| Ombudsteam shall take professional advice and will consult with
| the IETF Administration LLC with respect to the overall IETF
| budget.
END
2.2. Changes to Section 5
Section 5 of [RFC7776] is about remedies available to the Ombudsteam.
The last paragraph of that section is replaced as follows:
OLD
| Where specific action is required to ensure that a remedy is
| realized or enforced, the Ombudsteam will make a request in
| writing to the IETF Secretariat and/or IETF Administrative
| Director (IAD) to take action as appropriate.
NEW
| Where specific action is required to ensure that a remedy is
| realized or enforced, the Ombudsteam will make a request in
| writing to the IETF Secretariat and/or IETF LLC Executive Director
| to take action as appropriate.
END
2.3. Changes to References to RFC 7437
RFC 7776 updated RFC 7437 [RFC7437] by allowing the Ombudsteam to
form a recall petition. This document does not change any of the
associated processes. However, during the process of documenting the
replacement of the IAOC by the IETF Administration LLC, RFC 7437 has
been obsoleted by [RFC8713], and as part of that work, [RFC8713] has
included the update from RFC 7776.
This document updates RFC 7776 to remove the update of RFC 7437.
2.3.1. Changes to Metadata
The following change is made to the metadata at the head of
[RFC7776]:
OLD
| Updates: 2418, 7437
NEW
| Updates: 2418
END
2.3.2. Changes to the Abstract
The following change is made to text in the Abstract of [RFC7776]:
DELETE
| This document updates RFC 7437 by allowing the Ombudsteam to form
| a recall petition without further signatories.
END
2.3.3. Changes to Section 5.1
The following change is made to text in Section 5.1 of [RFC7776]:
OLD
| * Many IETF management positions are appointed by the NomCom with
| confirmation from the IESG, IAB, or ISOC. [RFC7437] describes
| the recall procedure for such appointments. This document
| updates [RFC7437] by allowing the Ombudsteam to form a recall
| petition on its own and without requiring 20 signatories from
| the community. Such a petition shall be treated in all ways
| like any other recall petition as described in [RFC7437]: that
| is, the fact of the petition and its signatories (the
| Ombudsteam) shall be announced to the IETF community, and a
| Recall Committee Chair shall be appointed to complete the
| Recall Committee process. It is expected that the Recall
| Committee will receive a briefing from the Ombudsteam
| explaining why recall is considered an appropriate remedy.
NEW
| * The Ombudsteam may form a recall petition on its own without
| requiring signatures from the community as described in
| [RFC8713].
END
3. IANA Considerations
This document has no IANA actions.
4. Security Considerations
This document has no implications for Internet security.
5. References
5.1. Normative References
[RFC7776] Resnick, P. and A. Farrel, "IETF Anti-Harassment
Procedures", BCP 25, RFC 7776, DOI 10.17487/RFC7776, March
2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7776>.
[RFC8713] Kucherawy, M., Ed., Hinden, R., Ed., and J. Livingood,
Ed., "IAB, IESG, and IETF LLC Selection, Confirmation, and
Recall Process: Operation of the IETF Nominating and
Recall Committees", BCP 10, RFC 8713,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8713, February 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8713>.
5.2. Informative References
[RFC7437] Kucherawy, M., Ed., "IAB, IESG, and IAOC Selection,
Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the
Nominating and Recall Committees", BCP 10, RFC 7437,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7437, January 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7437>.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Jason Livingood for suggesting the need for this document.
Subramanian Moonesamy, Sean Turner, Jon Peterson, Roman Danyliw, and
Barry Leiba raised useful points during their reviews of this work.
Authors' Addresses
Pete Resnick
Episteme Technology Consulting LLC
503 West Indiana Avenue
Urbana, Illinois 61801-4941
United States of America
Phone: +1 217 337 1905
Email: resnick@episteme.net
Adrian Farrel
Old Dog Consulting
Email: adrian@olddog.co.uk