<- RFC Index (2001..2100)
RFC 2100
Network Working Group J. Ashworth
Request for Comments: 2100 Ashworth & Associates
Category: Informational 1 April 1997
The Naming of Hosts
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.
Introduction
This RFC is a commentary on the difficulty of deciding upon an
acceptably distinctive hostname for one's computer, a problem which
grows in direct proportion to the logarithmically increasing size of
the Internet.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Except to TS Eliot.
And, for that matter, to David Addison, who hates iambic pentameter.
Poetry
The Naming of Hosts is a difficult matter,
It isn't just one of your holiday games;
You may think at first I'm as mad as a hatter
When I tell you, a host must have THREE DIFFERENT NAMES.
First of all, there's the name that the users use daily,
Such as venus, athena, and cisco, and ames,
Such as titan or sirius, hobbes or europa--
All of them sensible everyday names.
There are fancier names if you think they sound sweeter,
Some for the web pages, some for the flames:
Such as mercury, phoenix, orion, and charon--
But all of them sensible everyday names.
But I tell you, a host needs a name that's particular,
A name that's peculiar, and more dignified,
Else how can it keep its home page perpendicular,
And spread out its data, send pages world wide?
Ashworth Informational [Page 1]
RFC 2100 The Naming of Hosts 1 April 1997
Of names of this kind, I can give you a quorum,
Like lothlorien, pothole, or kobyashi-maru,
Such as pearly-gates.vatican, or else diplomatic-
Names that never belong to more than one host.
But above and beyond there's still one name left over,
And that is the name that you never will guess;
The name that no human research can discover--
But THE NAMESERVER KNOWS, and will us'ually confess.
When you notice a client in rapt meditation,
The reason, I tell you, is always the same:
The code is engaged in a deep consultation
On the address, the address, the address of its name:
It's ineffable,
effable,
Effanineffable,
Deep and inscrutable,
singular
Name.
Credits
Thanks to Don Libes, Mark Lottor, and a host of twisted
individuals^W^Wcreative sysadmins for providing source material for
this memo, to Andrew Lloyd-Webber, Cameron Mackintosh, and a cast of
thousands (particularly including Terrance Mann) who drew my
attention to the necessity, and of course, to Thomas Stearns Eliot,
for making this all necessary.
References
[1] Libes, D., "Choosing a Name for Your Computer", Communications
of the ACM, Vol. 32, No. 11, Pg. 1289, November 1989.
[2] Lottor, M. et al., "Domain Name Survey, Jan 1997",
namedroppers@internic.net
[3] Wong, M. et. al., "Cool Hostnames",
http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~mengwong/coolhosts.html
[4] Stearns, TS, _Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats_.
Ashworth Informational [Page 2]
RFC 2100 The Naming of Hosts 1 April 1997
Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
Particularly the cardiac security of certain famous poets.
Author's Address
Jay R. Ashworth
Ashworth & Associates
Advanced Technology Consulting
St. Petersburg FL 33709-4819
Phone: +1 813 790 7592
EMail: jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us
Ashworth Informational [Page 3]